Corrupt Judge Cindy Larsen Hard At Work For Mark Roe

Well the people voted, and they got what they voted for.

A Mark Roe patsy that will do his bidding and she is already hard at work finding all of his cases in his favor.

She does “owe” him for getting her elected.

I wonder how many cases she is hearing that are being investigated by her husband Snohomish County Deputy Jeff Ross.

The Public Disclosure Commission found her guilty of fraud and KING5 did an extensive story about it:

The PDC investigated these claims, and they finished their report in time for the voters to take the time and realize that she is a liar, a scammer and a fraud, but no one listened.

Cindy Larsen – Alleged violation of RCW 42.17A.235 and RCW 42.17A.240

 

Ticket Number: 
6928
Complainant: 
Beth Lucas, Melissa Day, Robert Schiffner
Respondent: 
Cindy Larsen
Created Date: 
July 25, 2016
Status of Investigations: 
Referred to Attorney General’s Office
Description: 

The complaints allege that Cindy Larsen failed to disclose in-kind contributions received in connection with a mailing and online political advertising sponsored by the political committee Safer Snohomish County.

The news ran story after story about it but evidently people still voted for this lackey because she is polluting our courtrooms to this day.

I even warned the community.

It remains to be seen if the Washington State Attorney General is actually going to do anything about it or sweep it under a rug.

I am however making a complaint to the Commission on Judicial Conduct so hopefully both agencies won’t drop the ball.

She needs to be removed from the bench, she stole that seat, thieves and miscreants are running the courts. Making life and death decisions for the citizens. That is the state of our Judicial System

 

Click here for reuse options!
Copyright 2017 Snohomish County Reporter
  • Elizabeth Anton

    I’ve got a good story for you that is happening right now in Massachusetts. A superior court judge who is absolutely corrupt, has now been nominated to the Appeals Court in our state. His hearing is in a few days but of course, it’s just a bogus formality.. Apparently messing with a Whistleblower and their family and friends, gets you rewarded…

    • Brandia

      In Washington they get appointed, but then they have to be elected. I’m not sure what the procedure is in Ma. but if that’s the case then it’s possible to get a campaign against them. If it’s just a straight appointment then the citizens are in trouble. Is there anyone who would or could run against them? If so get behind them 100% and try to get them elected.

      • Elizabeth Anton

        Nope. In Mass, they are appointed and never have to worry about any elections. The only legal requirement is they must retire by state law at 70. They get around this by “recall” nonsense. The courts are so clogged with case backlogs they create with their corrupt back room deals that the non rigged ones are neglected.
        A perfect excuse to keep the players on the bench…